Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

I am an actual lover in the H4831 powder. I get excellent velocity and precision outside of any caliber I have experimented with it in. With the 25-06 up into the 338 it truly is my visit powder of preference. I consider every type of powders when Doing the job up loads, nevertheless the H4831 normally seems to appear out on leading for precision and velocity when the case is with the 06 course or greater.

I'd say you would be greater off seeing if an individual can be willing to trade you some Varget in your H4831SC.

You might be accurate They're precisely the same the SC is brief cut so it meters better, I don't Feel you can obtain just frequent 4831 anymore

With the 154 grain Hornady SP inside the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a appreciably higher velocity and gives marginally superior precision. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally far better. For that reason, in Each individual of such instances I went with An additional powder, but I will surely hate to divest myself from the H4831.

Anyway, I knew the two lbs . of H4831SC used exactly the same data, but I did not know regardless of whether there was everything diverse between a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and one not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon verified they have been in reality identical and the only real distinction was the logo over the label.

It is really probably that no further discussion is needed, in which situation we endorse commencing a new thread. If even so you're feeling your reaction is necessary you are able to even now accomplish that.

Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the sole genuine change is that the shortcut meters better by reloading tools. Once It is loaded theres no purposeful big difference. I have heard the shortcut may have a little little bit more rapidly melt away charge h4831sc but It appears insignificant.

excaliber claimed: I've located the exact opposite to be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Gain Mag.

Currently applying IMR 4831 in the 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Apart from it being shorter Slice, precisely what is the main difference in these two powders, and will I switch to H4831sc?

It is really funny how over time loading numerous distinctive cartridges in many various rifles which i have never obtained satisfactory close final results with H-4831 or perhaps the brief-Minimize Variation.

I wanted somewhat more myself so I h4831 vs h4831sc went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to become included for a while (and possess a lot of a similar lots of powder).

That is an Severe extruded propellant and delivers heightened insensitivity to cold and warm temperatures.

It's possible you'll possibly: one) Continue h4831sc load data on and also have the objects stated underneath mechanically faraway from your searching cart:

The reality that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is exactly why you might be viewing better velocities obtained with that powder, rather than what you've witnessed While using the IMR stuff.